1 - 'Indenturing children to take care of us in old age' is more or less naturally inherent of being a higher-order primate -human in particular.
2 - In that such indenturement has become successively more difficult or impractical, modern man has developed ways of accommodating this with various financially practical mechanisms for what is 'congregationally operating society' -social
security, pensions et cetera.
3 - The right to make as much money as you can and spend it any way you choose' -the stockmarket/financial world of 'democracy in action' excesses, on the other hand, not merely indentures some one or two next generations of one's life-span, but
generations well down stream for life-style excesses that have absolutely nothing to do with one's 'physically natural well-being til death'.
-To put it in a nutshell, 'wealth indentures posterity to make it good' regardless of how it was made or how its 'owners' want to spend it; government has to back it up, like it or not, depreciating or not. -Needless to say, no one seems to see a
-More or less the same at all levels of government and management thruout the world: nepotism, cronyism, spoils-system packing, pork-barreling et cetera ('appearances of impropriety'); charging 'what the market can bear' and fee-splitting; lobbying,
influence-buying/peddling and 'aristocratic self-indulgence' (perks and double-dipping), and non-value-adding middlemanship in general: all are major problems ('That's what life is all about') in the government and economics of worth, earnings, taxation
and inflation. -It is furthermore, yet to be determined (let alone, be of interest) how 'egregiously large salaries and pensions affect future well-being and indenture posterity'.
(-from Arms Reduction and Global Reconstruction
December 8, 2008 Newsweek Magazine
Why even the very rich are cutting back on conspicuous consumption
By Johnnie L. Roberts
Multimillionaire Michael Hirtenstein used to flaunt his acquisitions of opulent real estate. "I collect homes because I enjoy it," he once told DansHamptons.com about his eight properties—which included a $27 million apartment on the 76th floor of
Manhattan's Time Warner Center. In August 2007, the 45-year-old Hirtenstein, who made his fortune in telecommunications, regaled the New York Post with his plans for a $35 million, glass-enclosed duplex in Manhattan's Tribeca neighborhood, replete with
suede-covered walls, three living rooms and a heated pool with built-in underwater video screen. Alas, the economy ground to a halt, and so did Hirtenstein's conspicuous consumption of real estate. He quietly reneged on the Tribeca duplex, forfeiting a
hefty deposit. That isn't to say Hirtenstein is now selling pencils from a tin cup. "I could walk downstairs now and buy a Ferrari," he says from a suite at Wynn Las Vegas, which boasts a dealership. "But all of my friends are hurting. I don't feel like
buying random toys."
Across America's upper strata, rich folk like Hirtenstein are experiencing an unfamiliar emotion: luxury shame. The late Coco Chanel, doyenne of 20th century fashion, long ago said that luxury is "the opposite of vulgarity," not of
poverty. But in these recessionary times, it seems vulgar to flaunt one's luxurious lifestyle. And so the wealthy are going blingless and eschewing the spending sprees of the recent Gilded Age, giving new meaning to the phrase "embarrassment of riches."
The trend is horrible news for the $175-billion global luxury market, which is already absorbing the blows of plummeting personal wealth. Just in time for Christmas, this new "embarrassment of riches" is cutting into sales of high-end retailers and
brands like Neiman Marcus and Saks Fifth Avenue, Bentley and BMW, Christie's and Sotheby's.
As hard-hit luxury advertisers scrimp, the sheen is dulling on the glossy, overcrowded, and once ad-rich collection of media that caters to the rich and famous. Ads in the December issues of major luxury magazines have plunged 22
percent from 2007, Media Industry Newsletter reports. Conde Nast—publisher of Vanity Fair, W and Vogue—is cutting issues of Men's Vogue and the new business glossy, Portfolio. Robb Report, the bible of connoisseur tastes that enjoyed years of prosperity
during the era of hedge-fund billionaires, has watched its advertising freeze. At American Express Publishing, which owns Travel-Leisure and Departures magazines, among others, "ad sales just hit a wall" after years of growth, says Ed Kelly, CEO.
Unofficially, profligacy became passé on Oct. 6, when disgraced Lehman Brothers CEO Richard Fuld appeared at a congressional hearing after the firm's historic $600-billion bankruptcy. He encountered a blizzard of scorn over his
half-billion-dollar compensation and baronial lifestyle: a $21 million Park Avenue penthouse, a $25 million estate in Greenwich, Conn., and an estimated $200 million art collection. "I have a basic question for you: Is this fair?" asked Rep. Henry
Waxman. Fuld only could muster sheepishness. (This month, he auctioned off $20 million of his art collection.) Not long after Fuld's public pillorying came the shameful disclosure that troubled insurer AIG had lavished top employees with a $440,000 spa
retreat at a ritzy St. Regis resort—held after Uncle Sam stepped in with a bailout that is costing taxpayers $150 billion.
Now, up and down Wall Street, the rich are showing off newfound contrition. Last month, Steve Schwarzman of private equity firm Blackstone Group expressed regret for the $3 million he spent on his 60th birthday party in February 2007—an
event that politicians and the press won't let him forget. "Obviously, I wouldn't have wanted to do that and become, you know, some kind of symbol of sorts of that period of time," he told a media conference in New York. Schwarzman, whose Blackstone
stake totaled $8 billion in June 2007, is down to his last $2 billion to $3 billion on paper as a result of the stupefying drop in the stock market.
This new frugality is also taking the gleam off Tinseltown. "Would I go out and buy something showy? Not at a time like this," says one of Hollywood's richest moguls. "It would be like bragging. "At Disney, top film marketers reportedly
are agonizing over the planned Valentine's Day release of "Confessions of a Shopaholic," about a young, brand-obsessed woman. They reportedly are considering reworking the ending of the film to address today's harsh economic realities. And Washington is
suffering pangs of debt regret. One caterer there likens the current wave of inconspicuousness to an earlier time. "It feels like after we went to war with Iraq," says Mark Michaels, owner of Occasion Caterers. "It's not a wise thing to throw a big
jolly party. "In real life, meanwhile, fashionistas are throwing on off-priced frocks and remodeling themselves as "recessionistas." Michelle Obama recently wore a $400 ensemble from J. Crew on "The Tonight Show," instead of a designer dress.
Calling this the Death of Luxury would be a grand embellishment. Consumers have taken a respite from opulence before—for example, when the Greed-is-Good era died with the '87 market crash, and after 9/11—only to shop with a vengeance
after a respectable amount of time had passed. Natural-born shamelessness assures the survival of extravagance: Sean Combs, for one, would cease to exist were he to leave the lap of luxury. And why should the wealthy elderly, facing actuarial fate,
embrace asceticism in their waning years? Some upscale purveyors believe luxurious living, like cigarette smoking, is an unshakeable habit. "It's very difficult to go downward... once you get used to this level of service," says Julian Niccolini,
managing partner of New York's Four Seasons restaurant.
Patrons as unfathomably affluent as some of his regulars ( David Koch, $17 billion, estimates Forbes magazine; Ron Perelman, $9.5 billion) are seen by luxury goods marketers as conspicuous consumers of last resort. They are among the
world's 10.1 million "HNWIs" (high net worth individuals) with $40.7 trillion in combined assets, according to the World Wealth Report 2008 from Merrill Lynch and Paris-based consultant Capgemini. "We're dealing with an area that's beyond wealth," says
Bill Fischer, a luxury travel agent. "If someone loses a couple $100 million in the stock market, his lifestyle stays the same. They always want what they want when they want it."
So what are luxury brands and merchants to do in unpopular times? Cultured pearl master Mikimoto, for one, is downplaying glitziness and highlighting heirloom appeal. In early October, it launched a new campaign called "the Original,"
in which the 115-year-old company emphasizes its tradition by featuring the image of a single cultured pearl in an open oyster shell. "That was a statement that only Mikimoto could make," says Maureen Gribbin, its chief USA spokeswoman. "Back to basics."
Curtis, CEO of the Robb Report's parent company, notices the change in tone. "Among the very highest end brands, we are seeing an appreciation for quality and the connoisseur, for pedigree and history over showiness," he says.
Other luxury brands are cultivating a guilt-free image with the timeless strategy of altruism. "You don't realize you've attended the launch of an automobile," says Marvet Britto, CEO of a New York PR agency, "because the vehicle is
parked in front of a charity event." In the past, elite marketers like Prada and Masarati matter-of-factly donated deluxe goods to charitybuzz, which orchestrates high-end charity auctions. But lately, they want more exacting "details on the target
audience of bidders for our events," says founder Coppy Holzman. "They want to get their brand message in front of top audiences." And in deliriously bidding small fortunes, he adds, the audiences also "address a guilt reality in their psyche."
Profligacy is passé now at Charitybuzz, too, Holzman allows. Instead of a fantasy trip that fetches $100,000 bid, he'll opt to sell four trips at $25,000 each—"luxury, but not over-the-top obscene."
And making the scene now is a new style of luxury retailing that, oxymoronically, is introducing discretion and thrift to conspicuous consumption. How can spendthrifts get their fix without the guilt? One option: upstart online
membership-only sites like Gilt.com and ideeli.com, which hold first-come-first-served, deeply discounted sales of luxury goods in limited supply. The purchases arrive in the mail in unadorned boxes. Customers "don't want to be seen walking around with
huge Prada shopping bags," says Gilt Group CEO Susan Lyne, the former ABC Network president and Martha Stewart chief executive. Now there's a concept: conspicuous consumers who are in the closet.