My reason for only the sidebox is that it conveys all the information necessary here: that even the Dutch, with all their centuries of experience and knowledge suggesting the incontovertible and negative influences of man, continue, like ants, to
proliferate like ants -or is there not something Sisyphus about this?
September 16, 2005 [sm5916] Science Magazine
[The below is sidebox to the main article, Scientists Weigh Options for Rebuilding New Orleans]
Questioning the ‘Dutch Solution’
KRAGGENBURG, THE NETHERLANDS —Dutch scientists are making waves— literally. In a hangar here, researchers from Delft Hydraulics, a research and consulting institute, have built a 4-meter-wide slice of a dike at the end of a basin, used to mimic the North Sea crashing into the coast. Their goal: to test how different types of surface materials weather the thunderous onslaught.
Even after a millennium of hard-won experience, the Dutch are still perfecting the art of dike construction. They have little choice. More than half of the country— including Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and most of The Hague—lies below sea level and continues to sink, and the water is expected to rise as a result of climate change. Three major, often erratic, rivers compound the challenge. No wonder that many in the United States are wondering if the Dutch experience holds lessons for New Orleans.
Scientists in both countries agree that some of the technology developed here could be useful, and Dutch institutes and businesses are eager to help. But their offers come at a time when Dutch water management is increasingly questioned at home. Some scientists say the reliance on engineering prowess is not only ecologically harmful but has increased vulnerability in the long run. The national mindset shouldn’t be exported without awareness of its downsides, cautions Toine Smits, a water management expert and professor at two universities.
The Dutch, too, learned their lessons the hard way.On 1 February 1953, a severe North Sea storm combined with a spring tide burst through neglected dikes in hundreds of places, killing more than 1800 people and flooding 2000 km2 in the
southwestern provinces. The answer, built over the subsequent 45 years,was The Delta Works, a series of dikes, dams, and other structures that closed off the major sea arms in the southwestern delta—destroying entire ecosystems in the process—and
shortened the coastline by 600 kilometers. Dikes that protect the most densely populated areas of the country are built to withstand all but storms expected once every 10,000 years, says Delft Hydraulics director Huib de Vriend.
But in the end, protecting low-lying areas with dikes only is a “dead-end street” that should be avoided if possible, says Henk Saeijs, a former civil servant and professor at Erasmus University Rotterdam. When natural sedimentation stops and groundwater levels are kept low, the land sinks, requiring ever higher dikes and bigger pumps to get the water out. (“Pumping or drowning” is a national motto here.) Meanwhile, the illusion of safety lures people and investments,making future floods even more costly.
Although there is no turning back for built-up areas, it’s “utterly crazy” to keep urbanizing areas far below sea level, as is still happening in the Netherlands, Saeijs says. Instead, he advocates “embracing the water”—an approach in which floods are not a major problem because people live on mounds, in higher areas, or “floating cities.”
But Han Vrijling, a hydraulics engineer at Delft Technical University, says that in most cases, giving the water its freedom is a “romantic”notion that’s not compatible with a modern economy. Besides, “we shouldn’t be too nervous” about ever-higher dikes towering over a sinking country, he says.
[-back to options at the top(*1)]